Posted by
Bob Siegel on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:51:58 AM
“Almost everybody I know is reading The Da Vinci Code and talking about it. Either that or they’ve seen
the movie. From what little I can gather, it sounds like some whole new
interpretation about who Jesus really was. Exactly what is the Da Vinci Code
and why do Christians seem so concerned about this book?”
The Da Vinci Code is a very well written
novel, but unfortunately the author claims that his novel is based on sound
historical research. Artistically, I give it a B+. As for the accuracy of the
beliefs? One could defend unicorns more
easily.
I’m
not going to discuss the fictitious plot of the novel, but rather the
background information the author claims is accurate. The author is Dan Brown.
He is not an historian, nor does he claim to be, but he does claim to have done
his homework.
Da Vinci, of course, stands for
none other than Leonardo Da Vinci, the famous painter who supposedly belonged
to a secret society called Priory Of Sion. According to Brown, this society has
labored since the time of Christ to protect itself from the Catholic Church
which was trying to bury their big secret. Clues to unlocking this secret are
found in some of Da Vinci’s paintings such as The Mona Lisa or The Last
Supper. What is the big secret? Jesus Christ got married! He married none
other than Mary Magdalene, one of his female followers. They had a daughter who
was taken away and hidden, and whose family survives to this day. In fact, Mary
Magdalene is actually the Holy Grail you always hear about. Got that? The Holy
Grail is not a cup, but rather, a symbol for the holy bride of Jesus.
Now,
some might freak out at the idea of the son of God being married, but it gets
even better. The society Priory of Sion is also guarding the fact that Jesus
wanted his wife Mary to be the head of the church. They teach that Jesus was
not God, that his deity was invented by Fourth Century Christians. In fact, the church was commanded
to deify Jesus by the first Christian Emperor, Constantine. The “secret information passed down by Jesus’
true followers” teaches that we should worship many gods and goddesses. They
particularly emphasize goddess worship, and these goddesses are often worshiped
in the same manner as some of the ancient cultic rituals, through communal sex
as a high point of the religious service.
They
claim that the Catholic church tried to suppress the truth about Mary Magdalene
being the head of the church, because the church was run by a male dominated
society. For this reason, teachings of
The Da Vinci Code may sound appealing to some radical feminists.
As
ancient sources, Dan Brown sites(among
other documents) a scroll rejected by the early church entitled The Gospel of Mary.
Response
Even
though he’s only writing a novel, Dan Brown, claims that this secret society,
Priory Of Sion, really exists, that their practices and rituals really exist,
that all documents referred to are real, etc.
For the sake of time, let’s stipulate this. All we’ve proven is that a genuine society
honestly believes Jesus got married. This does not prove that what they believe
is actually true. To evaluate such a claim, we must go to the source of their
beliefs, ancient history.
1)
There is an ancient document called The Gospel of Mary which supposedly
hints at this relationship Jesus had with Mary Magdalene. Now, if the church really thought that Mary
wrote the Gospel of Mary, or Thomas
wrote the Gospel of Thomas or Philip
wrote The Gospel of Philip, they
would have included them in the New Testament canon, for they included
everything truly written by apostles or other close companions of Jesus. But in
those days, Christianity had become so popular, it was common for anyone
wanting to fabricate a document to write the name of an apostle (or other well
known figure) on it. The church was wiser than this and they didn’t blindly
accept any document with a famous person’s name scribbled on the top.
A copy of The
Gospel of Mary and many of these other extra biblical gospels was
discovered in Egypt in the year 1945 as part
of a whole collection of Gnostic
writings.
Gnosticism
was an early heresy refuted by the early church. Gnosticism taught that Jesus
did not resurrect from the dead (at least not physically) and that God did not
create the earth. The earth was created by lower beings called Aeons.
Gnosticism also taught that anything physical or material was evil. Only the
spiritual and immaterial was good. This makes the Priory Of Sion’s high view of
communal sex a bit contradictory because most ancient Gnostics tended to frown
upon sexuality. And when they did engage
in sex for procreation purposes, they still believed it was something
negative. Yet these same Gnostic
documents are appealed to as evidence of the priory’s claims about Jesus and
Mary.
Gnostic
documents date many years after the books of the New Testament. The New
Testament was completed by the end of the first
century. The Gnostic gospels date no earlier than the mid to late second century.
2)
The Bible is not anti- woman or anti “woman in leadership”. We don’t need
alternative scriptures to find a higher view of women. In Gal 3, Paul tells us that as far as status in the
church is concerned, there is “neither male nor female” but all are one in
Christ.
In
fact, Mary Magdalene, herself is portrayed very positively in the New
Testament. She is the first to encounter the resurrected Christ and report the
meeting to Jesus’ male disciples, who at first, did not believe her (John 20:10-20, Luke 20:9-12). Although the Bible is not a chauvinistic
book, it was written in a
chauvinistic culture. Reporting that a woman had been the first to witness the
resurrection, would not have been the shrewdest way to commit fraud and
generate a legend. This says something about the integrity of the gospel
writers.
Let
me also say a word here about the Catholic Church. Although I am not a Catholic
myself, I at least want to defend the fact that Catholics over the ages had no
incentive to oppress positive views of women.
If they had such an anti-female agenda, why did they not omit these
resurrection passages about Mary and Jesus?
And of course, there’s the other Mary, the mother of Jesus. Catholics
pray to the Virgin Mary. Now I don’t believe in praying to Mary, but they do
and this practice hardly shows a low view of women.
3)
Brown claims Emperor Constantine demanded that Jesus be deified. As a matter of
fact, Christians were calling Jesus, God all the way back to the first century
when the New Testament was written. This same New Testament reports Jesus
Himself making the claim.
John 14:9-11
9 Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after
I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the
Father. How can you say, `Show us the Father'? Don't you believe that I am in
the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just
my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. Believe me when I say that I am in the Father
and the Father is in me;
See
also (John 1:1, John 8:58)
True,
some Christians still argued about the nature of Jesus, because many of those
New Testament verses were hard to fathom. And so, the church did not officially
ratify this belief until the Council of Nicea,(325AD) and yes, this counsel was sponsored by Constantine. But all Constantine said was, “Settle this
question about whether or not Jesus is God. I don’t care how you settle it,
just settle it.”
Brown
also claims that Constantine decided which books would
make it into the New Testament cannon. Allow me to make the obvious, obvious. Constantine was dead when they chose
which books would go into the New Testament cannon. This council (Council of Carthage) was held
in 390AD. Constantine died in 337AD. You don’t
have to be a math major to do the math.
Conclusion
We
all get fascinated with secrets and mysteries. I submit that the real Jesus in
the real scriptures can satiate our appetite for holding life in awe. The God
of the universe loves you so much that He took the form of a man and visited
our world. He died on the cross for our selfish natures. If you had been the
only person alive, He would have come down and died just for you. That’s how
much He loves you. Shortly after His
execution, He rose from the dead so that we too could rise from the dead
someday and live forever in paradise. What could be more awesome than
that? And He didn’t need a code to tell
us about it.
Scripture
taken from THE HOLY BIBLE
New
International Version NIV
Copyright
© 1973, 1979, 1984 by International
Bible Society
Used
by permission of Zondervan Publishing House.
All
rights reserved.
Other controversial posts by Bob Siegel
Was Joseph Smith Really a Prophet of God?
Why
This Evangelical Christian Minister Does Not Support Huckabee Posted at 5:24:28 AM on Saturday, January
05, 2008
Politically
Correct Quiz Posted at 9:07:37 PM on Friday, January 04, 2008
So What If He's A Mormon? Posted at 4:05:11 AM on Sunday, December 16,
2007
One Thing We Can Know Right Away Posted at 11:53:06 AM on Thursday, December
27, 2007
Maybe Next Time Big Bird Can Be The Moderator Posted at 1:16:39 AM on Saturday, December
15, 2007
Oh, That Horrible Christianity!
Posted at 4:53:43 AM on Thursday, December
13, 2007
Other:
Satire: The Ultimate Guide For Comparing the Candidates
Jihad Drill
A Eulogy For The Word, "Tolerance"
Note: The Bob
Siegel Show can be heard every Sunday from 3:00 to 4:00 PM on KCBQ 1170 on the dial
or KCBQ.com to listen live over the internet.
Call in
toll free number if you want to join in the program with questions or comments:
1-888-344-1170
Bob’s
website is: www.bobsiegel.net