Posted by
Bob Siegel on Friday, January 18, 2008 9:28:29 AM
Unless
you are referring to the Apocrypha ( a section in some Bibles included
alongside the New and Old Testaments) we do not actually have different versions
of the Bible, but rather, different translations.
This is nothing unique to the Bible. All ancient works have numerous
translations from numerous translators, because scholars/linguists enjoy
making their own translations and sometimes they enjoy using different
synonyms for words. (For example: A word
describing the size
of a rock might translate as large or big) And in any
translation, translated by a real team of scholars, the differences are
Minot. Occasionally we get some people who don't really know Greek or
Hebrew and attempt a translation anyway, (such as the Jehovah's
Witnesses did with their New World Translation), but for the sake of
future conversation, please note that when I refer to a translation, I
mean a real translation.
With
that in mind, there is little difference between one Bible translation
and another. Even in those volumes which include the Apocrypha, the Old
and New Testaments are virtually the same as the OT and NT in volumes
that do not include the Apocrypha.
Now,
there is some minor difference to note between The King James Version
and the modern versions, because when King James commissioned his
translators in 1611, some key New Testament manuscripts had not been
discovered yet, (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Alexandrius). Another key
manuscript, the Codex Vaticanus, did exist at that time but it was the
property of Rome and the Catholic church certainly wasn't going to let
the Church of England use it.
Still,
there are literally thousands of New Testament manuscripts and even when
England printed the 1611 publication, they created a translation almost
as accurate, (but not quite as accurate) as the modern ones. When I say
"not quite as accurate" I am referring to a microscopic
difference, very few verses and very short verses, nothing that makes
any real difference to the overall gospel message.
I
realize that different Christians prefer different versions.
All too often, people are merely gravitating toward the version
they were first exposed to. Since the translations are very similar,
this is fairly harmless. Still,
the more we can include the latest manuscripts, the more accurate we
will be. For myself, there
are two translations that I prefer. I enjoy the New International
Version because it captures the spirit of the Greek language, sometimes
using some paraphrase to make its point. With certain Greek words or
phrases, many ideas would come up in the mind of a Greek and a “one
word for one word” translation does not always capture this. On the
other hand, I enjoy The New American Standard Version, because it is a
more accurate word for word translation.
For
example: Rom 8:9-10 in NIV says:
You, however, are controlled not by
the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you.
And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to
Christ.
The
same verse in NASV says:
However, you are not in the flesh but
in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone
does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him.
The
word flesh did mean
"sinful nature" depending upon its context. NIV caught the
spirit of the context and described
it accurately, but still, the Greek text really does say flesh
and not sinful nature.
Also, in Greek, being "in the Spirit" meant being
controlled by the Spirit but the word controlled
was not actually there in the manuscripts. Therefore, each translation
is providing its own special contribution. I want to know that the word controlled
is not really there but I also want to know that ancient Greeks
would have thought about control when reading the phrase "in the
Spirit."
I
hope this helps.
All Scripture taken from THE HOLY BIBLE
New International Version
NIV
Copyright 1973, 1979,
1984 by International Bible Society
Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House.
All rights reserved.
Other related posts:
Are Christian Ministers Just In It For The Money?
Posted at 9:23:39 AM
on
Friday, January 18, 2008
Why
This Evangelical Christian Minister Does Not Support Huckabee Posted at 5:24:28 AM on Saturday, January
05, 2008
So What If He's A Mormon? Posted at 4:05:11 AM on Sunday, December 16,
2007
Was Joseph Smith Really a Prophet of God?
Oh, That Horrible Christianity!
Posted at 4:53:43 AM on Thursday, December
13, 2007
Is The DaVinci Code Something to be Taken Serliously?
How Does One Become a Christian?
Note: The Bob
Siegel Show can be heard every Sunday from 3:00 to 4:00 PM on KCBQ 1170 on the dial
or KCBQ.com to listen live over the internet.
Call in
toll free number if you want to join in the program with questions or comments:
1-888-344-1170
Bob’s
website is: www.bobsiegel.net